VSC Update on I-140/I-485 Concurrent Filings

Cite as "Posted on AILA InfoNet at Doc. No. 02082041 (Aug. 20, 2002) ."

VSC Liaison Chair, Christopher Stowe, received the following e-mail correspondence from Keith J. Canney concerning the Vermont Service Center’s response to the USCIS’s interim regulation allowing concurrent filings of Forms I-140 and I-485. The VSC Committee received inquiries from many AILA members who commented that after July 31, 2002, they experienced a wide range of reactions that included the return of the I-485, denials on the I-485 and supervisors advising that VSC is not accepting concurrent I-140/I-485 filings.

> Subject: Re: follow up on concurrent filing

> Chris,
>
> This message will address the concerns set forth in this message as well as the previous message you had forwarded. Concurrent filings present many new workflow challenges to VSC. We are currently working with our contractor to solidify many of the new processes that are required.

> We are currently accepting all properly filed concurrent I-140/I-485 filings.

> We have been instructed to reject (not accept) I-140/I-485 filings where the I-140 requires a labor certification, but one has not been included with the submission. Cases in this scenario would not be considered properly filed.

> It also appears that we will be required to review concurrent I-140 submissions immediately following fee receipt to determine if a filing is frivolous (e.g. E11 nanny - not eligible under any of the fields set forth in E11 regs). We will deny cases that are considered frivolous without the issuance of an RFE.

> As the standard for "frivolous" is still somewhat vague for various I-140 classifications, VSC is awaiting further guidance from HQ [Headquarters] before we take any such action.

> You posed the question of processing time of I-140s filed independently versus those filed concurrently. At this point, HQ would like us to work concurrently filed I-140s within 60 days of receipt. This will allow us to work an I-765 and/or I-131 before the applicant is eligible for an interim card at the 90 day mark. Given current adjudicative priorities, delayed processing times (on cases such as I-129s), and required IBIS security checks, working concurrently filed I-140s within 60 days will definitely be a challenge to VSC.

> The day the concurrent filing rule appeared in the Federal Register, we [notified] the information officers that we are accepting said cases. We have reminded them of such so as to avoid any confusion in the future. If erroneous information is being provided, it is helpful if the information officer's name could be provided. We can then address the issue directly rather than send out a generic reminder to the masses.

> Keith


(08/26/2002)

For more immigration news, please click here

Adjustment of Status | Adoption | Advance Parole | Application Fees | Asylum & Removal | Business Entities | Corporate Clients | Consular Processing | Divorce | E-1 & E-2 | EAD | F-1 | Family Immigration | FAQs | Forms | Investor Visa | Immigration Glossary |
K Visa
| L Visa | Marriage | Naturalization | Non-immigrant Visas | O-1 | Processing Time | Road to Green Card | TN | Visa Bulletin

"The best way to
predict your future is
simply to create it."
- Peter Drucker.
.

Copyright © 1999-2005. Zhang & Associates, P.C. All Rights Reserved
New York   Houston Chicago Austin Los Angeles  
Tel: 1.800.230.7040 • E-mail: info@hooyou.comPrivacy Policy